This is why, when I critique, I select one specific issue to “discuss” before hand, such
as plot, arc, theme…
It allows me to question the ‘intent’ of certain issues, rather than declaring whether it’s good or bad, or even if it like it or not.
Stating my understanding of said intent promotes a more open exchange that serves both me and the writer in terms of what works or how an intent may be resolved.
interesting and honest, as always! In terms of critique, I think it matters WHY and WHO one is critiquing. Has it been asked for? Is the person a student, for example? Is it a workshop situation? And ego - is this about myself or supporting the other person? Editor, commissioner, teacher - or friend, fellow-writer etc.? And does it matter whether the situation is professional, one-to-one, group...? Certainly critique 'at distance' is a minefield!
Precisely!
This is why, when I critique, I select one specific issue to “discuss” before hand, such
as plot, arc, theme…
It allows me to question the ‘intent’ of certain issues, rather than declaring whether it’s good or bad, or even if it like it or not.
Stating my understanding of said intent promotes a more open exchange that serves both me and the writer in terms of what works or how an intent may be resolved.
interesting and honest, as always! In terms of critique, I think it matters WHY and WHO one is critiquing. Has it been asked for? Is the person a student, for example? Is it a workshop situation? And ego - is this about myself or supporting the other person? Editor, commissioner, teacher - or friend, fellow-writer etc.? And does it matter whether the situation is professional, one-to-one, group...? Certainly critique 'at distance' is a minefield!