Oddly, I don’t think I ever asked myself this explicit question until very recently; perhaps only in the last few days. Ask me if I consider myself ‘a Writer’ and my answer will be immediate and unequivocal; ‘yes’. But am I also ‘a Poet’…?
Even though I have produced a number of volumes of poetry (and will have a new one — Less — out in a couple of months) I have reached the inescapable conclusion that I cannot, in all honesty, call myself a fully-fledged Poet. Given my history — a track record, proof of publication, some competition recognition, running poetry groups, mentoring etc. — you might regard such a negative claim as dishonest or disingenuous. But it is one I’m happy to make, and here are the reasons why:
Quality
I want to be up-front here: this has nothing to do with the quality of my work. I think a fair proportion of what I write is pretty decent; indeed, if it wasn’t would people call my efforts “a great and inspiring read”, “a special form of poetic plate-spinning”? Would I get to read at literary events, be listed in competitions?
So if some kind of quality scale was the only arbiter, then perhaps the answer to the question would be ‘yes’.
Single-mindedness and dedication
It’s also fair to say that I enjoy writing poetry. Enormously. There is something magical about the form, something which comes alive (both in you and on the page) when you find you’re able to say the things you want to say with brevity, lyrically and metaphorically, looking at it ‘slant’. There is an undeniable sense of pride and achievement if you can look at a line of poetry you’ve written and say “I wrote that”. Or even better, when someone else says “I love that”. (Though the same is true of prose, of course…)
On that basis? Well, yes, I’m a Poet.
But I know many people who are much more single-minded about the form: poetry is all they write; their breadth of reading, knowledge and recall is astonishing; they will pursue a rough draft to the ends of the earth rather than say “that’s good enough”. Such people live and breathe poetry — and they’re ‘better’ at it than I am. Take poetry away from them and it would be like removing a limb or their reason for being…
That certain something…
And ultimately there’s an undefinable and intangible element in all of this. To be able to say “I am a Poet” requires a unique kind of self-belief. “I write poetry” is a statement of fact (whether those poems are good, bad, or indifferent); but “I am a Poet” is entirely different gravy. And I am most definitely not in the school that claims “if you write poetry, you’re a Poet” (or it you take photographs, you’re ‘a Photographer’; if you sing, you’re ‘a Singer’…)
Who’s to say what ‘that certain something’ comprises of? Quality? Single-mindedness? Dedication? Belief? Talent? Pixie-dust? Most likely all of those things — plus a key element which defies definition, naming.
In the end…
…I suppose I think being called ‘a Poet’ is an honorific embracing all of the above. Maybe I’m something of an intellectual Neanderthal, but I don’t want to cheapen the title — ‘a Poet’ — by dishing it out to all-and-sundry. Surely that would devalue it. If being ‘a Poet’ is equivalent to a First Class Honours degree, then I’m okay having an Upper-Second.
Hence, I’m happy to say that I write decent poetry but do not consider myself ‘a Poet’.
But in the end maybe what I’m called is not my decision; maybe such ambiguous, nebulous and open-ended titles are best bestowed on us by others. And if so, perhaps that’s how it should be; who can say? Is that the fairest outcome?
So, as evidence for the defence — or prosecution! — I leave you with this short piece from my forthcoming collection, Less.
P.S. I particularly like the last two lines..!
belong
beneath rain-heavy clouds caressing the horizon
I lift my pillowed head and wake to the window-flicker of sunrise
light cascading the hollow between the big trees
picking itself out in the puddles of last night’s storm
early morning is the break between days
that instant when I find out whether I still belong
Brilliant topic. Won’t bore you with my history of credits in poetry - assume I am advanced and have done well above average. Plus I have been majorly and solely dedicated to it for over 30 years. I will never call myself a poet. I will never be the laureate but in a fictional world if I was I still wouldn’t. To me the form walls of prose, poetry, drama, film scripts etc are all porous. They all cross fertilise, leak into, feed and influence each other. If you’re highly evolved and committed to activity in any of these fields the only logical thing to call yourself is a writer.
I can relate to this. As a poet I suffer from imposter syndrome. I write poems easily, too easily, so I think they can't be any good. Their birth may be relatively painless but then I carry them around like babies on my hip, feeding them when they cry out for nourishment and changing them whenever I think they need it. I love them but they annoy me, they tire me out and I become desperate to put them down, and let them go and wish them a happy future. Then I go back and look at the first draft I made weeks ago and realise it was better than the finished piece.
One year I submitted every week to the O'Beal competition. Despite blood, sweat and tears, all my efforts failed. That's it! I decided. Despite that, the next year I dashed one off quickly at the beginning and forgot all about it and won 250 euros. Yes, poetry is a fascinating subject I know everything and nothing about.